!!! NOTE: MERGE THIS PAGE WITH NRP-CAS !!!
Published on April 29, 2011, edited by Tibi, Kurt, Ishan, Ian, Francois, and Steve. See original doc, last modified on Oct 14, 2012 before content was moved here.
Work on the value system is hosted on github. We are using REA (for Resources, Events and Agents) designed by Bill McCarthy of Michigan State University (See more on Bill McCarthy’s website). See a prototype HERE.
See Screenshots of the new Value Accounting System of SENSORICA
See latest demo video March 2014.
See all pages in the category Value_Accounting_System_(VAS)
More on NRP-CAS
The contribution accounting system (CAS) is an IT tool for commons-based peer production or peer production. At the network level, it describes transformation and flow of resources. At the product level, it describes amalgamation of resources and contributions into something.
The CAS is NOT a currency system, it is not a system of exchange. It keeps track of how contributions amalgamate into something like products, services, infrastructure, social goods, etc. It keeps a record of who is doing what (role), how well (reputation) and how much (value) in a particular project. Its output is a normalized distribution benefits, including fluid equity for a particular project. If goods and services are created to be exchanged on the market, the CAS helps redistribute the revenue.
The CAS reappropriates labor, which is a major departure from capitalism. In capitalism, labor becomes a commodity. In a corporation for example, the worker exchanges his labor against wage. This transaction dispossesses the worker of the fruits of his own labor. In other words, the owner of capital owns the production of all workers. The CAS allows peers to turn their labor into fluid equity and thus to own the future revenue generated from the products they co-produce.
The CAS embodies tangible/extrinsic incentives. It allows redistribution of benefits to participants in projects. Moreover, the CAS incentivizes collaboration by reducing the risk. If someone creates a project and asks for collaboration but there is no documentation, no sharing of designs, or R&D processes, or of recipes (manufacturing script with bill of materials), other affiliates of the OVN might grow reluctant to participate, because the project becomes too dependent on its initiator or main facilitator. If this affiliate leaves the OVN, no one can continue the work. Therefore, past investment is lost or eventual benefits are delayed. Proper documentation and logging into CAS reduces the risk for investment (in time, $, materials, and other), because it insures continuity of the project in case the initiator or main facilitator leaves.
See more on Value
Interpretations of the CAS
The interpretation of the actual version of the CAS is not settled yet.
CAS and potential of value
One can argue that nothing logged in NRP-CAS has valuable a priori. A prototype that someone physically assembles today and is logged in NRP-CAS and linked to different types of contributions (time, $, etc,) can end up never being used by the community, never cited, entirely forgotten. One way to see it is that something is valuable if it finds its way into other things. But nothing has a priori valuable, no matter how tangible or real it is. We can legitimately use an interpretation according to which NRP-CAS is only about potentials. Nothing has been marketed as valuable in the OVN's NRP-CAS until now. It only contains logged contributions connection. According to this new interpretation of the NRP-CAS we can say that things that are already linked together, these things that are used/consumed/cited in other things, are valuable or are in the process of becoming valuable. In other words, value in the system becomes actualized when resources (created through contributions) are linked together, value is actualized by the edges of the network of resources. But to quantify further (it's always a relative quantity set in comparison with other things) we need another process, and a part of that is subjective.
General layout of the value accounting system
OVN-OS stands for Open Value Network Operating System.
Other ways to refer to it are: Open Value Network infrastructure (OVNi), Network Resource Planning (NRP), of simply Value Accounting System (CAS).
- Bob's - OVN-OS architecture layout for an open value network node
- Bob's - OVN-OS internetworking protocol, for network to network interaction
The contributions log system assists affiliates in recording/logging contributions. One expects rewards (revenues) after the value creation process, after efforts have been deployed. Fair redistribution of revenue, in proportion to everyone’s contribution, which arrives at a time in the future, requires information on past contributions, risk levels, etc.. It is very important to record enough information about involvement, participation, contributions, even before formalizing the revenue redistribution scheme.
Contributions can be time (which is complemented by a description of activities/tasks performed), money (spent on a particular project), a virtual or physical space (for a given activity within a given project), materials (including tools/instruments), access to resources or to the market (using social capital), etc.
Contributions have quantities AND qualities associated with them.
The contribution log system is organized to map formal projects that have a direct path to market, i.e. resulting in products/services that will be exchanged on the market and generate revenues. Revenue and acknowledgement are extrinsic incentives. The value system also contains other categories/projects which don't have a traced path to a particular market. These are exploratory projects or passion-driven projects (see section on Integrating a gift economy within a value network).
Read about SENSORICA's first contribution log system.
See the second version, the actual prototype in testing. This prototype will evolve very rapidly this year.
Evaluation of contributions
How different types of contributions are evaluated. This system has an objective part, which relies on some metrics, and a subjective part, which relies on negotiation. See more on The evaluation system
Back office catalog
Assigns value to deterministic, recurrent back office tasks. See the Back office catalog page.
(for continuous contributions)
Amalgamation of value
The Value Equation
Pay dead ends or mistakes, bring in the main value stream other contributions.
Solidarity mechanisms are part of the open-value network to ensure two unique aspects: compassion and distribution of risk. Compassion is an important part of human-collaboration and therefore, the network provides insurance mechanism for its members based on the members’ reputation. In addition to compassion, solidarity mechanisms are used to partially reward for unavoidable failures in order to create higher levels of trust and knowledge base within the network; these failures include: process inadequacy, task challenge, process complexity, uncertainty, hypothesis testing, and exploratory testing. The network governance determines the decisions on the implementation of solidarity mechanisms.
See the Project page.
Value transfer between projects
See the Value transfer between projects page
Allows value network affiliates to plan their contributions. This engine uses history to predict fluid equity once the project reaches maturity and generates revenue. Affiliates can use it to decide how to allocate their resources across different projects, in order to optimize their investments, to mitigate their risk, etc.
The CAS simulator also intervenes in the Project and task management system. For every available task it estimates the fluid equity once the project reaches maturity and generates revenue. This acts as a direct incentive for affiliates to take the task, knowing the impact is will have on their future revenue, and the risk associated with it (see discussion).
Install a CAS
Network of networks
See the Network of Networks page.